BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//California Center for Population Research - ECPv6.15.14//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:California Center for Population Research
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://ccpr.ucla.edu
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for California Center for Population Research
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Los_Angeles
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:PDT
DTSTART:20240310T100000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
TZNAME:PST
DTSTART:20241103T090000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:PDT
DTSTART:20250309T100000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
TZNAME:PST
DTSTART:20251102T090000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:PDT
DTSTART:20260308T100000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
TZNAME:PST
DTSTART:20261101T090000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20250122T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20250122T131500
DTSTAMP:20260502T041549
CREATED:20240909T215237Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250221T185408Z
UID:10000868-1737547200-1737551700@ccpr.ucla.edu
SUMMARY:Marissa Thompson\, Columbia University "They have Black in their blood: Exploring how genetic ancestry tests affect racial appraisals and classifications"
DESCRIPTION:Biography: Marissa Thompson is an assistant professor of sociology at Columbia University. Her research focuses on the causes and consequences of racial and socioeconomic inequality\, with an emphasis on understanding the role of education in shaping disparate outcomes over the life-course. Marissa’s current research investigates\, for example\, parental preferences regarding school segregation\, the causal effects of first-dollar scholarship policies on college access\, and the role of genetic ancestry tests in racial boundary-making processes. She employs a range of methods in her work\, including quantitative methods\, survey experiments\, and both computational and qualitative analyses of text data. \n\n\n\n\n\n“They have Black in their blood”: Exploring how genetic ancestry tests affect racial appraisals and classifications\n\n\n\n\n\nAbstract: How do genetic ancestry tests (GATs) affect Black Americans’ beliefs about when others should – or should not – identify as Black? Using two survey experiments that integrate causal inference with computational text analysis\, we disentangle the effects of GAT results\, setting\, and prior identification on racial classifications and evaluations. We find that respondents have an increased likelihood of approving of a person’s decision to identify as Black and of classifying them as Black if that person has higher levels of GAT-measured Sub-Saharan African ancestry. Further\, we identify meaningful gaps between the responses made by respondents themselves and their perception of the typical response made by members of their own racial group; these patterns are consistent with broad pluralistic ignorance towards the social rules governing racial classifications and evaluations. Finally\, free text responses reveal a range of strategies used in evaluations. We find that the aspects that affect approval and evaluations differ from those that affect classifications; respondents selectively integrate different sources of information\, including GAT results\, via a dual classification and evaluation process which we term racial contextualism. \n  \nAn audio recording of Marissa Thompson’s presentation may be accessed here. \nThe slides of the presentation may be accessed here.
URL:https://ccpr.ucla.edu/event/marissa-thompson-columbia-university/
LOCATION:4240A Public Affairs Bldg
CATEGORIES:CCPR Seminar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20250129T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20250129T131500
DTSTAMP:20260502T041549
CREATED:20240909T215437Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250220T170807Z
UID:10000869-1738152000-1738156500@ccpr.ucla.edu
SUMMARY:Sherry Glied\, New York University Wagner School\, "Who Really Pays for Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance? General Reflections and New Evidence from the ACA Dependent Coverage Mandate"
DESCRIPTION:Biography: Sherry Glied\, an economist\, is Dean of the Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service at New York University. From 2010-2012\, Glied served as the Senate-confirmed Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation at the Department of Health and Human Services. She served as Senior Economist on the President’s Council of Economic Advisers in 1992-1993\, under Presidents Bush and Clinton. In 2016-2017\, she served on the Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking. She is currently chairing New York Governor Hochul’s Commission on the Future of Health Care. Glied is a member of the Board of Directors of Geisinger\, the Milbank Fund\, and the Social Science Research Council. She is a Nonresident Senior Fellow of the Brookings Institution and an elected member of the National Academy of Medicine\, the National Bureau of Economic Research\, the National Academy of Social Insurance\, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. \nWho Really Pays for Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance? General Reflections and New Evidence from the ACA Dependent Coverage Mandate\nAbstract: The incidence of employer-provided health insurance within firms is important for the design of the tax treatment of employer-based coverage and for understanding the evolving structure of the US labor market. Economic theory and empirical studies conclude that the cost of voluntary employer-sponsored health insurance falls on employees as a group. However\, the distribution of overall and subsidy incidence and the mechanism through which incidence occurs have not been well-established. \n  \nThis talk will provide new evidence (joint with Hansoo Ko) on incidence by examining the dependent coverage mandate in the ACA\, which mandates that adult children to age 26 may remain on their parents’ policies. We confirm the overall incidence of the mandate and then consider three situations in which the benefits of this new coverage to an employee differ from the costs to an employer. I will then relate this evidence to the broader empirical literature and policy. \n  \nAn audio recording of Sherry Glied’s presentation may be accessed here. \nThe slides of the presentation may be accessed here.
URL:https://ccpr.ucla.edu/event/sherry-glied-new-york-university-wagner/
LOCATION:4240A Public Affairs Bldg
CATEGORIES:CCPR Seminar
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR